{"id":4956,"date":"2023-03-28T08:57:00","date_gmt":"2023-03-27T23:57:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/inpsjapan.com\/en\/?p=4956"},"modified":"2023-12-21T09:11:23","modified_gmt":"2023-12-21T00:11:23","slug":"we-dont-have-to-choose-between-nuclear-madmen","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/inpsjapan.com\/en\/news\/viewpoints\/we-dont-have-to-choose-between-nuclear-madmen\/","title":{"rendered":"We Don\u2019t Have to Choose Between Nuclear Madmen"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>By Norman Solomon*<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>SAN FRANCISCO, 28 March 2023 (IDN) \u2014 The announcement by Vladimir Putin over the weekend that Russia will deploy tactical nuclear weapons in Belarus marked a further escalation of potentially cataclysmic tensions over the war in neighbouring Ukraine. As the Associated Press<a href=\"https:\/\/www.npr.org\/2023\/03\/25\/1166089485\/putin-russia-tactical-nuclear-weapons-belarus\">&nbsp;reported<\/a>, \u201cPutin said the move was triggered by Britain\u2019s decision this past week to provide Ukraine with armour-piercing rounds containing depleted uranium.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>There\u2019s always an excuse for nuclear madness, and the United States has certainly provided ample rationales for the Russian leader\u2019s display of it. American nuclear warheads have been deployed in Europe since the mid-1950s, and current&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/armscontrolcenter.org\/fact-sheet-u-s-nuclear-weapons-in-europe\/\">best estimates<\/a>&nbsp;say 100 are there now\u2014in Belgium, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands and Turkey.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Count on U.S. corporate media to (appropriately) condemn Putin\u2019s announcement while dodging key realities of how the USA, for decades, has been pushing the nuclear envelope toward conflagration. The U.S. government\u2019s breaking of its&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/nsarchive.gwu.edu\/briefing-book\/russia-programs\/2017-12-12\/nato-expansion-what-gorbachev-heard-western-leaders-early\">pledge not to expand NATO eastward<\/a>&nbsp;after the fall of the Berlin Wall\u2014instead expanding into 10 Eastern European countries\u2014was only one aspect of official Washington\u2019s reckless approach.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>During this century, the runaway motor of nuclear irresponsibility has been mostly revved by the United States. In 2002, President George W. Bush withdrew the U.S. from the<a href=\"https:\/\/www.armscontrol.org\/factsheets\/abmtreaty\">&nbsp;Anti-Ballistic Missile Treaty<\/a>, a vital agreement that had been in effect for 30 years. Negotiated by the Nixon administration and the Soviet Union, the treaty&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.armscontrol.org\/factsheets\/abmtreaty\">declared<\/a>&nbsp;that its limits would be a \u201csubstantial factor in curbing the race in strategic offensive arms.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>His lofty rhetoric aside, President Obama launched a $1.7 trillion program for further developing U.S. nuclear forces under the euphemism of \u201cmodernization.\u201d To make matters worse, President Trump pulled the United States out of the&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.armscontrol.org\/act\/2019-09\/news\/us-completes-inf-treaty-withdrawal\">Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces Treaty<\/a>, a crucial pact between Washington and Moscow that had eliminated an entire category of missiles from Europe since 1988.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The madness has remained resolutely bipartisan. Joe Biden quickly dashed hopes that he would be a more enlightened president about nuclear weapons. Far from pushing to reinstate the cancelled treaties, from the outset of his presidency Biden boosted measures like placing ABM systems in Poland and Romania. Calling them \u201cdefensive\u201d does not change the fact that those systems&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.rferl.org\/a\/nato-shows-off-missile-base-in-romania-calling-it-purely-defensive-\/30291193.html\">can be retrofitted<\/a>&nbsp;with offensive cruise missiles. A quick look at a map would underscore why such moves were so ominous when viewed through Kremlin windows.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Contrary to his 2020 campaign platform, President Biden has insisted that the United States must retain the option of first use of nuclear weapons. His administration\u2019s landmark Nuclear Posture Review issued a year ago,&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.commondreams.org\/news\/2022\/03\/25\/dangerous-experts-slam-biden-keeping-first-use-nuclear-strike-table\">reaffirmed<\/a>&nbsp;rather than renounced that option. A leader of the organization Global Zero&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/derekjGZ\/status\/1507399457113055247\">put it this way<\/a>: \u201cInstead of distancing himself from the nuclear coercion and brinkmanship of thugs like Putin and Trump, Biden is following their lead. There\u2019s no plausible scenario in which a nuclear first strike by the U.S. makes any sense whatsoever. We need smarter strategies.\u201d&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Daniel Ellsberg\u2014whose book&nbsp;<em>The Doomsday Machine<\/em>&nbsp;truly should be required reading in the White House and the Kremlin\u2014summed up humanity\u2019s extremely dire predicament and imperative when he&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2023\/03\/24\/opinion\/international-world\/ellsberg-nuclear-war-ukraine.html\">told<\/a>&nbsp;the&nbsp;<em>New York Times<\/em>&nbsp;days ago: \u201cFor 70 years, the U.S. has frequently made the kind of wrongful first-use threats of nuclear weapons that Putin is making now in Ukraine. We should never have done that, nor should Putin be doing it now. I\u2019m worried that his monstrous threat of nuclear war to retain Russian control of Crimea is not a bluff. President Biden campaigned in 2020 on a promise to declare a policy of no first use of nuclear weapons. He should keep that promise, and the world should demand the same commitment from Putin.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>We can&nbsp;<a href=\"http:\/\/www.defusenuclearwar.org\/\">make a difference<\/a>\u2014maybe even<em>&nbsp;the<\/em>&nbsp;difference\u2014to avert global nuclear annihilation. This week (28 March), TV viewers will be reminded of such possibilities by the new documentary&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.pbs.org\/wgbh\/americanexperience\/films\/movement-and-madman\/\"><em>The Movement and the \u201cMadman\u201d<\/em>&nbsp;on PBS<\/a>. The film \u201cshows how two antiwar protests in the fall of 1969 \u2014 the largest the country had ever seen\u2014pressured President Nixon to cancel what he called his \u2018madman\u2019 plans for a massive escalation of the U.S. war in Vietnam, including a threat to use nuclear weapons. At the time, protestors had no idea how influential they could be and how many lives they may have saved.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>In 2023, we have no idea how influential we can be and how many lives we might save\u2014if we\u2019re really willing to try.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><em>*Norman Solomon is the national director of RootsAction.org and the executive director of the Institute for Public Accuracy. He is the author of a dozen books, including War Made Easy. His next book, War Made Invisible: How America Hides the Human Toll of Its Military Machine, will be published in June 2023 by The New Press.&nbsp;<\/em>[InDepthNews]<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Image: A new film, \u201cThe MOVEMENT and the \u2018MADMAN&#8217;\u201d shows how two antiwar protests in the fall of 1969\u2014the largest USA had ever seen\u2014caused President Nixon to cancel what he called his \u201cmadman\u201d plans for a massive escalation of the US war in Vietnam, including his threats to use nuclear weapons.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>By Norman Solomon* SAN FRANCISCO, 28 March 2023 (IDN) \u2014 The announcement by Vladimir Putin over the weekend that Russia will deploy tactical nuclear weapons in Belarus marked a further escalation of potentially cataclysmic tensions over the war in neighbouring Ukraine. As the Associated Press&nbsp;reported, \u201cPutin said the move was triggered by Britain\u2019s decision this [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":4957,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[29],"tags":[],"class_list":{"0":"post-4956","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-viewpoints"},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/inpsjapan.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4956","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/inpsjapan.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/inpsjapan.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/inpsjapan.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/inpsjapan.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4956"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/inpsjapan.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4956\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":4958,"href":"https:\/\/inpsjapan.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4956\/revisions\/4958"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/inpsjapan.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/4957"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/inpsjapan.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4956"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/inpsjapan.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4956"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/inpsjapan.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4956"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}