<\/p>\n\n\n
![\"Andrew](\"https:\/\/inpsjapan.com\/en\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/12\/andrew-firmin.jpg\")
1.\u00a0<\/strong>More people are likely to be exposed to\u00a0conflict<\/strong>\u00a0and its consequences, including humanitarian and human rights disasters, mass displacement and long-term trauma. The message of 2024 is largely one of impunity: perpetrators of conflict, including in\u00a0Israel<\/a>\u00a0and\u00a0Russia<\/a>, will be confident they can resist international pressure and escape accountability. While there may be some kind of ceasefire in Gaza or halt to the Russia-Ukraine conflict, those responsible for large-scale atrocities are unlikely to face justice. Impunity is also likely to prevail in the conflicts taking place largely off the global radar, including in\u00a0Myanmar<\/a>\u00a0and\u00a0Sudan<\/a>. There will also be growing concern about the\u00a0use of AI and automated weapons<\/a>\u00a0in warfare, a troublingly under-regulated area.<\/p>\n\n\n\n As recent events in Lebanon and Syria have shown, changing dynamics, including shifting calculations made by countries such as Iran, Israel, Russia, Turkey and the USA, mean that frozen conflicts could reignite and new ones could erupt. As in Syria, these shifts could create sudden moments of opportunity; the international community and civil society must respond quickly when these come.<\/p>\n\n\n 2.\u00a0<\/strong>The\u00a0second Trump administration<\/strong>\u00a0will have a global impact on many current challenges. It\u2019s likely to reduce pressure on Israel, hamper the response to the climate crisis, put more strain on already flawed and struggling global governance institutions and embolden right-wing populists and nationalists the world over. These will bring negative consequences for civic space \u2013 the space for civil society, which depends on the freedoms of association, expression and peaceful assembly. Funding for civil society is also likely to be drastically reduced as a result of the new administration\u2019s shifting priorities.<\/p>\n\n\n\n 3. <\/strong>2025 is the year that states are required to develop new plans to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and adapt to climate change under the Paris Agreement. The process will culminate in the COP30 climate summit in Brazil, likely the world\u2019s last chance to limit the global temperature rise to 1.5 degrees above preindustrial levels. This will only happen if states stand up to fossil fuel companies and look beyond narrow short-term interests. Failing that, more of the debate may come to focus on adaptation. The unresolved question of who will pay for climate transition will remain central. Meanwhile, extreme weather events such as heatwaves and floods can be expected to continue to devastate communities, impose high economic costs, drive migration and exacerbate conflicts.<\/p>\n\n\n\n 4. <\/strong>Globally, economic dysfunction<\/strong> is likely to increase, with more people struggling to afford basic necessities, increasingly including housing, as prices continue to rise, with climate change and conflict among the causes. The gap between the struggling many and the ultra-wealthy few will become more visible, and anger at rising prices or taxes will drive people<\/a> \u2013 particularly young people deprived of opportunities \u2013 onto the streets. State repression will often follow. Frustration with the status quo means people will keep looking for political alternatives, a situation right-wing populists and nationalists will keep exploiting. But demands for labour rights, particularly among younger workers, will also likely increase, along with pressure for policies such as wealth taxes, a universal basic income and a shorter working week.<\/p>\n\n\n\n 5. <\/strong>A year when the largest number of people ever went to the polls has ended \u2013 but there are still plenty of elections<\/strong> to come. Where elections are free and fair, voters are likely to keep rejecting incumbents, particularly due to economic hardship. Right-wing populists and nationalists are likely to benefit the most, but the tide will eventually turn: once they\u2019ve been around long enough to be perceived as part of the political establishment, they too will see their positions threatened, and they can be expected to respond with authoritarianism, repression and the scapegoating of excluded groups. More politically manipulated misogyny, homophobia, transphobia and anti-migrant rhetoric can be expected as a result.<\/p>\n\n\n\n 6.<\/strong> Even if developments in generative AI<\/strong> slow as the current model reaches the limits of the human-generated material it feeds on, international regulation and data protection will likely continue to lag behind. The use of AI-enabled surveillance, such as facial recognition, against activists is likely to increase and become more normalised. The challenge of disinformation is likely to intensify, particularly around conflicts and elections.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Several tech leaders have actively taken the side of right-wing populists and authoritarians, putting their platforms and wealth at the service of their political ambitions. Emerging alternative social media platforms offer some promise but are likely to face similar problems as they grow.<\/p>\n\n\n\n 7. <\/strong>Climate change, conflict, economic strife, repression of LGBTQI+ identities and civil and political repression will continue to drive displacement and migration<\/strong>. Most migrants will remain in difficult and underfunded conditions in global south countries. In the global north, right-wing shifts are expected to drive more restrictive and repressive policies, including the deportation of migrants to countries where they may be at risk. Attacks on civil society working to defend their rights, including by assisting at sea and land borders, are also likely to intensify.<\/p>\n\n\n\n 8. <\/strong>The backlash against women\u2019s and LGBTQI+ rights<\/strong> will continue. The US right wing will continue to fund anti-rights movements in the global south, notably in Commonwealth African countries, while European conservative groups will continue to export their anti-rights campaigns, as some Spanish organisations have long done throughout Latin America. Disinformation efforts from multiple sources, including Russian state media, will continue to influence public opinion. This will leave civil society largely on the defensive, focused on consolidating gains and preventing setbacks.<\/p>\n\n\n\n 9.<\/strong> As a result of these trends, the ability of civil society organisations and activists to operate freely will remain under pressure in the majority of countries<\/a>. Just when its work is most needed, civil society will face growing restrictions on fundamental civic freedoms<\/strong>, including in the form of anti-NGO laws and laws that label civil society as agents of foreign powers, the criminalisation of protests and increasing threats to the safety of activists and journalists. Civil society will have to devote more of its resources to protecting its space, at the expense of the resources available to promote and advance rights.<\/p>\n\n\n\n 10.<\/strong> Despite these many challenges, civil society<\/strong> will continue to strive on all fronts. It will continue to combine advocacy, protests, online campaigns, strategic litigation and international diplomacy. As awareness grows of the interconnected and transnational nature of the challenges, it will emphasise solidarity actions that transcend national boundaries and make connections between different struggles in different contexts.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Even in difficult circumstances, civil society achieved some notable victories in 2024. In the Czech Republic<\/a>, civil society\u2019s efforts led to a landmark reform of rape laws, and in Poland<\/a> they resulted in a law making emergency contraception available without prescription, overturning previous restrictive legislation. After extensive civil society advocacy, Thailand<\/a> led the way in Southeast Asia by passing a marriage equality law, while Greece<\/a> became the first predominantly Christian Orthodox country to legalise same-sex marriage<\/p>\n\n\n\n People defended democracy. In South Korea<\/a>, people took to the streets in large numbers to resist martial law, while in Bangladesh<\/a>, protest action led to the ousting of a longstanding authoritarian government. In Guatemala<\/a>, a president committed to fighting corruption was sworn in after civil society organised mass protests to demand that powerful elites respect the election results, and in Venezuela<\/a>, hundreds of thousands organised to defend the integrity of the election, defeated the authoritarian government in the polls and took to the streets in the face of severe repression when the results weren\u2019t recognised. In Senegal<\/a>, civil society mobilised to prevent an attempt to postpone an election that resulted in an opposition win.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Civil society won victories in climate and environmental litigation \u2013 including in Ecuador<\/a>, India<\/a> and Switzerland<\/a> \u2013 to force governments to recognise the human rights impacts of climate change and do more to reduce emissions and curb pollution. Civil society also took to the courts<\/a> to pressure governments to stop arms sales to Israel, with a successful verdict in the Netherlands<\/a> and others pending.<\/p>\n\n\n\n In 2025, the struggle continues. Civil society will keep carrying the torch of hope that a more peaceful, just, equal and sustainable world is possible. This idea will remain as important as the tangible impact we\u2019ll continue to achieve despite the difficult circumstances.<\/p>\n\n\n\n INPS Japan\/IPS UN Bureau Report<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" By Andrew Firmin and In\u00e9s M. Pousadela LONDON \/ MONTEVIDEO, Uruguay (IPS)\u00a0– It\u2019s been a tumultuous year, and a tough one for struggles for human rights. Civil society\u2019s work to seek social justice and hold the powerful to account has been tested at every turn. Civil society has kept holding the line, resisting power grabs […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":3725,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[40,19,16,32,22],"tags":[],"class_list":{"0":"post-8494","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-global-regions","8":"category-population-immigration","9":"category-news","10":"category-regions","11":"category-un-civil-society"},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/inpsjapan.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8494","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/inpsjapan.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/inpsjapan.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/inpsjapan.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/inpsjapan.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=8494"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/inpsjapan.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8494\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":8497,"href":"https:\/\/inpsjapan.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8494\/revisions\/8497"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/inpsjapan.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/3725"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/inpsjapan.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=8494"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/inpsjapan.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=8494"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/inpsjapan.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=8494"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}![\"In\u00e9s](\"https:\/\/inpsjapan.com\/en\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/12\/s200_ines.pousadela.jpg\")
Andrew Firmin<\/strong> is Editor-in-Chief and In\u00e9s M. Pousadela<\/strong> is Senior Research Specialist at CIVICUS: World Alliance for Citizen Participation. The two are co-directors and writers for CIVICUS Lens<\/a> and co-authors of the State of Civil Society Report<\/a>.<\/pre>\n\n\n\n