Supporters gathered in Kathmandu for a more subdued demonstration to demand the monarchy\u2019s return<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Shristi Karki<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n On Tuesday, leader of the monarchist RPP once again gathered on Kathmandu\u2019s streets to deliver fiery speeches, but this time there was no arson and looting and no need for riot police to fire live rounds or tear gas.<\/p>\n\n\n\n RPP leaders demanded the release of their members including vice-president Rabindra Mishra and MP Dhawal Shamsher Rana were arrested during the violent 28 March protests at Tinkune <\/a>which left two dead.<\/p>\n\n\n\n They denounced the current leadership of the main parties, demanding the restitution of Nepal as a Hindu kingdom<\/a>. They also said the government was responsible for the fatalities on 28 March because it provoked its rally with a tear gas attack even before it started.<\/p>\n\n\n\n It has now been revealed that the police fired at least 100 live rounds from high powered assault rifles at the crowd. Twenty-one of the 120 injured received bullet wounds, and most of them were bystanders and people trying to reach home.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Tuesday protest on the Ring Road in Balkhu was much more subdued, and comparatively fewer RPP supporters showed up. The arson and vandalism in the previous protest appears to have cost some support for former king Gyanendra <\/a>especially for the anointment of medical tycoon and bank defaulter Durga Prasai <\/a>as \u2018commander\u2019 of the Tinkune rally.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Some monarchists acknowledge Gyanendra\u2019s mistakes when was king 2001-2008, but say he has had a lot of time to reflect on his shortcomings and seems more disciplined and committed. His supporters have tried to build on nostalgia among some Nepalis for domestic stability <\/a>and international respect that the monarchy<\/a> commanded.<\/p>\n\n\n\n \u201cNepalis were promised better service delivery, opportunities for the underserved, as well as better, more honest use of state resources, but the people in leadership <\/a>have not been able to deliver on their commitments,\u201d says RPP leader Prakash Chandra Lohani. \u201cThe gap between their rhetoric and reality has widened, the people feel betrayed, and the respect Nepali people had previously had for them has changed to revulsion.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n Indeed, many commentators have warned the three main parties and their serial prime ministers<\/a> who have ruled Nepal for much of the past 30 years should address rising public anger with them, and see the writing on the wall.<\/p>\n\n\n\n \u2018The UML, NC and Maoists<\/a> must introspect about their conduct,\u201d warns Gunaraj Luitel, editor of Nagarik, in an op-ed this week. \u2018These leaders for life may save themselves from simmering public anger, but they will not be able to save the system. The monarchist wave can only be dispelled when citizens are assured of better governance<\/a> through younger leaders<\/a>, and reforms.\u2019<\/p>\n\n\n\n Rifts between radical royals who are gunning for a return to Panchayat-style absolutism <\/a>and moderate monarchists who favour a constitutional king have also weakened the movement somewhat. The split between the RPP and RPP-Nepal cost the royalists numbers in Parliament in 2022, and both parties denounced the violence last month, albeit shifting the blame on the government.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The irony is that the same royalists who want to scrap the republican Constitution had formed electoral alliances with the UML during the 2022 elections. RPP-Nepal chair Kamal Thapa contested the 2022 election with the UML. Thapa has not taken part in the last two rallies, saying he will only be a part of a movement under a national flag, and not a RPP party banner.<\/p>\n\n\n\n For his part, the RPP\u2019s Rajendra Lingden is said to be hesitant to censure some of his party\u2019s more radical royalists for fear of fissure within his ranks, despite his aversion to Durga Prasai\u2019s role.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Analysts have questioned why supporters of the monarchy <\/a>have decided to reestablish an institution that would not ultimately have executive decision-making power. There are doubts about whether authoritarian-minded Gyanendra will be satisfied being a ceremonial king<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Read also: <\/strong>Nepal\u2019s d\u00e9j\u00e0 vu on Black Friday<\/strong><\/a>, Sonia Awale<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n “The Nepali people will not accept an absolute monarchy <\/a>at this point of time, and both the public as well as king Gyanendra<\/a> are fully aware that there is no other possibility beyond a constitutional monarchy,” asserts the RPP\u2019s Lohani. \u201cThe traditional monarchy\u2019s institutional capacity might have been enough to meet the needs of feudal Nepal, but anabsolute monarchy is impossible both in concept and practice in the context of modern day Nepal<\/a>.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n <\/a>Shristi Karki<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n writer<\/p>\n\n\n\nShristi Karki is a correspondent with Nepali Times. She joined Nepali Times as an intern in 2020, becoming a part of the newsroom full-time after graduating from Kathmandu University School of Arts. Karki has reported on politics, current affairs, art and culture.<\/pre>\n\n\n\n